Summary

Test anxiety is common in high-stakes settings like the SAT and ACT, and it can depress performance when worry consumes working memory. The good news, several low-cost interventions show measurable benefits when used correctly. Expressive writing just before an exam can lift scores for highly anxious students, breathing protocols that slow respiration improve calm and attention, and brief pre-performance routines help regulate arousal. Psychological reappraisal, reframing nerves as fuel, also boosts outcomes on real exams. Mindfulness programs show moderate effects on test anxiety, though with heterogeneity and some publication bias. Finally, deliberate practice with retrieval and spaced repetition reduces uncertainty, which is a driver of anxiety, and well-designed AI tutors can accelerate that preparation, though guardrails matter. The evidence supports a practical, hybrid plan.

TL;DR

• Test anxiety harms grades, small to moderate average effects, especially in mid-grades (von der Embse et al., 2018).
• Expressive writing, 10 minutes pre-test, raised classroom exam scores for anxious students (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011).
• Mindfulness meta-analysis reported moderate to large reductions in test anxiety, 2024, with heterogeneity (Yılmazer et al., 2024).
• Slow breathing and breathwork reduce stress and anxiety, 2022–2023 meta-analyses (Fincham et al., 2023).
• AI tutor RCT, 2025, showed over double learning gains vs active learning, use with guardrails (Kestin et al., 2025; Bastani et al., 2025).

What counts as test anxiety and why does it hurt scores?

Test anxiety is a pattern of worry, intrusive thoughts, and heightened arousal that can consume working memory during evaluative tasks. A 30-year meta-analysis found test anxiety is significantly and negatively related to standardized test scores, entrance exams, and GPA, with effects most pronounced in middle grades (von der Embse et al., 2018). These effects are small to moderate on average, so not everyone is equally affected, but for some students the impact is meaningful.

Two mechanisms matter for SAT, ACT, AP, and IB settings:

1. Cognitive load, worries crowd out problem-solving resources.
2. Avoidance cycles, anxious students study less effectively and procrastinate.

Evidence-based interventions target both pathways.

Which quick interventions actually calm pre-exam nerves?

Expressive writing, 10 minutes before testing. Two randomized field experiments showed that writing about exam worries immediately before a high-stakes test removed the typical negative link between test anxiety and performance and lifted scores by about 6 percentage points among highly anxious students (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011). Effects are most reliable for students high in anxiety and when the prompt explicitly asks for worries, not generic writing (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011). Meta-analyses of expressive writing across contexts show small, heterogeneous benefits, so results vary by design and population (Frattaroli, 2006, summarized in).

Breathing that slows respiration and increases heart-rate variability. A 2023 meta-analysis concluded breathwork reduces stress and anxiety with small to moderate effects, particularly when sessions last at least 5 minutes and are practiced repeatedly (Fincham et al., 2023). Slow-paced breathing and related HRV biofeedback in school settings reduce anxiety and social stress and improve regulation, though protocols differ (Aranberri-Ruiz et al., 2022). Breathwork seems most effective when taught with guidance and practiced over multiple sessions (Bentley et al., 2023).

Pre-performance routines. In sports and performance domains, short, consistent routines before execution improve outcomes under pressure, likely by directing attention and stabilizing arousal. A meta-analysis reported small positive effects on performance when routines are practiced in advance and are cue-based (Rupprecht et al., 2021). Classroom evidence is thinner, so adapt cautiously to exams and combine with the stronger interventions above.

Psychological reappraisal, “nerves as fuel.” RCTs show that telling students to reinterpret stress arousal as helpful improves GRE math performance both in lab practice and on their later official GRE scores (Jamieson et al., 2010). In community-college math classes, stress-reappraisal instructions reduced evaluation anxiety and improved exam scores compared with controls (Jamieson et al., 2016).

Mindfulness programs. A 2024 meta-analysis across 1,275 participants found a moderate to large overall reduction in test anxiety from mindfulness-based interventions, though heterogeneity and potential publication bias warrant caution (Yılmazer et al., 2024). Online collegiate programs also show benefits, typically modest, and adherence matters (Priebe and Kurtz-Costes, 2022).

Values affirmation for identity threat contexts. Brief writing about personal values reduces stereotype-related stress and can narrow achievement gaps in some courses, but effects vary by context and replications are mixed (Cohen et al., 2006; Jordt et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2021; Gutmann et al., 2021 replication).

What is the study-backed “day-of-test” routine?

Five steps, 15 to 20 minutes total:

1. Arrive early, set up materials. Arriving with a checklist reduces uncertainty, which correlates with anxiety (von der Embse et al., 2018).
2. Breathing primer, 4 minutes. Inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6 seconds, light nasal breathing, eyes soft, shoulders relaxed. Evidence favors sessions longer than 5 minutes over time, but even a short primer helps focus if practiced previously (Fincham et al., 2023; Bentley et al., 2023).
3. Expressive writing, 8 to 10 minutes, if you are highly anxious. Write privately about worries and possible consequences, do not problem-solve, then put the paper away (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011).
4. Reappraisal cue, 30 seconds. Quietly rehearse, “My heart is pumping oxygen to my brain, this energy helps me think,” a script validated in RCTs (Jamieson et al., 2010; Jamieson et al., 2016).
5. Micro routine at section starts. Two breaths, read the first item fully, then act. Performance routines benefit from consistent cues (Rupprecht et al., 2021).

How should students prepare in the weeks before the SAT or ACT to reduce anxiety?

Preparation reduces uncertainty, which is linked to test anxiety in correlational and longitudinal work (von der Embse et al., 2018). Two study strategies stand out:

• Retrieval practice and spaced repetition. Reviews rate practice testing and distributed practice as high-utility techniques that improve long-term retention across subjects, compared with rereading or highlighting (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Roediger and Karpicke, 2006).
• Hybrid tutoring, human plus AI. As of August 2025, a randomized trial in a Harvard physics course found an AI tutor with guardrails produced over double the median learning gains of an in-class active learning session, in less time (Kestin et al., 2025). However, a large RCT in high school economics found that unstructured generative AI help, without learning-oriented guardrails, harmed learning, especially for lower-achieving students (Bastani et al., 2025).
  • Translation for SAT/ACT: AI tutor, digital tutor, intelligent tutoring system, or LLM chatbot can accelerate problem exposure and feedback, but should prompt retrieval, explain errors, and space practice. Human coaches remain valuable for motivation, calibration, and metacognitive strategy.

What works at a program level, not just on test day?

A meta-analysis of 44 randomized trials in university students showed interventions, especially behavior therapy and cognitive-behavioral components, reduce test anxiety with a large effect on anxiety and a small to moderate effect on grades at post-test, with benefits maintained at follow-up (Huntley et al., 2019). School-based mindfulness programs also reduce test anxiety on average, though heterogeneity and possible bias mean careful implementation and monitoring are advisable (Yılmazer et al., 2024).

How to do the top three techniques, step by step

1) Expressive writing, 10 minutes

• When: Right before the exam, or practice it during timed drills.
• Prompt: “Write about your worries and thoughts about today’s test and its consequences. Do not fix problems, just express.”
• Why: Offloads intrusive thoughts and frees working memory for math problem-solving and reading comprehension (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011).
• Caveats: Effects vary across populations and designs; expect benefits mainly if anxiety is high (Frattaroli, 2006, summarized in).

2) Slow-paced breathing, 5 to 10 minutes, 4–6 breaths per minute

• Protocol: Inhale 4 seconds, exhale 6 seconds, through the nose if comfortable, light belly movement.
• Frequency: Daily in the week before the exam, plus a short primer on test day.
• Why: Breathwork reduces stress and anxiety in trials and meta-analyses, and HRV biofeedback variants show classroom benefits (Fincham et al., 2023; Aranberri-Ruiz et al., 2022; Bentley et al., 2023).
• Caveats: One-off, very brief sessions are less effective than repeated practice (Bentley et al., 2023).

3) Stress reappraisal script, 30 seconds

• Script: “My heart rate and quick breathing are my body delivering oxygen and energy to my brain. This helps me think clearly.”
• Why: RCTs show reappraising arousal improves GRE performance and reduces evaluation anxiety in classroom exams (Jamieson et al., 2010; Jamieson et al., 2016).

Where do human tutors, AI tutors, or hybrids fit for anxiety management during prep?

What are the limits and risks?

• Heterogeneity and publication bias. Mindfulness effects on test anxiety are positive on average but vary, and bias checks suggest caution (Yılmazer et al., 2024).
• Expressive writing is context-dependent. Benefits concentrate among highly anxious students and may fade with repetition or with generic prompts (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011; overview in Rude et al., 2023).
• Values affirmation is mixed. Positive effects in some courses, null in others; treat as optional and context-specific (Jordt et al., 2017; Gutmann et al., 2021).
• AI tutors need guardrails. When AI shortcuts replace thinking, learning can suffer, especially for lower-achieving students (Bastani et al., 2025).

How to bundle these tools into a two-week pilot plan

1. Daily, 10 minutes of slow-paced breathing or HRV biofeedback, work up to 5 to 10 minutes per session, five days per week (Fincham et al., 2023; Bentley et al., 2023).
2. Every other day, 40 to 60 minutes of adaptive practice with retrieval and spaced repetition using a digital tutor, intelligent tutoring system, or LLM chatbot configured to prompt retrieval before hints (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Kestin et al., 2025).
3. Twice per week during timed sections, rehearse the reappraisal script at the start of each section (Jamieson et al., 2010).
4. Once per week, if you are high in test anxiety, add expressive writing before a full-length practice exam (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011).
5. Build and rehearse a 60-second pre-performance routine that pairs two slow breaths, a brief posture reset, and the first read-carefully action cue (Rupprecht et al., 2021).

If anxiety is severe or persistent, consult a licensed clinician. CBT-based programs have the strongest overall evidence for reducing test anxiety and supporting performance over time (Huntley et al., 2019).

FAQ

What are the implications for SAT and ACT prep?
Anxiety management should be integrated with learning science. Use retrieval practice and spaced repetition to reduce uncertainty, then layer a short breathing primer, an optional expressive writing bout for highly anxious test-takers, and a stress-reappraisal cue at section starts. Evidence indicates each piece targets a different bottleneck, with the strongest classroom RCT evidence for expressive writing and reappraisal just before exams (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011; Jamieson et al., 2016).

How do AI tutors compare to human tutors on learning gains?
As of August 2025, an RCT found a research-designed AI tutor produced over double the median learning gains of a live active-learning class in physics, in less time (Kestin et al., 2025). Yet a large field experiment showed that unguarded generative AI help harmed learning, especially for lower-achieving students (Bastani et al., 2025). The best evidence points to a hybrid: let AI handle adaptive practice and automated feedback, and use human coaching for motivation and metacognition.

What should students be aware of with these anxiety tools?
Effects vary. Mindfulness meta-analysis shows overall benefits but with heterogeneity and possible publication bias (Yılmazer et al., 2024). Expressive writing mainly helps those who are highly anxious and when the prompt focuses on worries (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011). Breathing protocols work better with repeated practice and sessions of at least 5 minutes (Bentley et al., 2023).

As a student, how does this prepare me to study better?
Reducing anxiety buys back working memory for problem-solving. Pair a 5- to 10-minute breathing block with retrieval-based study and spaced repetition. Before practice tests, consider expressive writing if you feel very anxious, then use a reappraisal cue to frame arousal as useful. This combination targets both knowledge and regulation (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Ramirez and Beilock, 2011; Jamieson et al., 2010).

Do these interventions help on AP, IB, and college exams too?
Yes, many studies were conducted in authentic classrooms and on real exams, including GRE, mathematics courses, and college STEM classes. Generalization is strongest for expressive writing and reappraisal used immediately before testing, and for mindfulness practiced over weeks (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011; Jamieson et al., 2016; Yılmazer et al., 2024).

Is there evidence these approaches raise scores, not just reduce feelings?
Yes. Expressive writing and stress reappraisal increased exam performance in field settings, not only self-reported calm (Ramirez and Beilock, 2011; Jamieson et al., 2016). Mindfulness and CBT-style programs show smaller but meaningful improvements in grades alongside anxiety reductions in meta-analytic reviews (Huntley et al., 2019).

Are there quick wins for the night before?
Short breathing, a finalized routine checklist, and a single reappraisal read-through are low risk and supported by evidence. Avoid last-minute cramming, which reduces sleep and increases anxiety. Use spaced retrieval in the days prior for better retention (Dunlosky et al., 2013).

Call to action

Use the two-week pilot above, then review outcomes with the table to decide your hybrid plan. Keep what measurably lowers your nerves and raises your practice-test scores, and adjust anything that adds time without benefit.

Sources

Bastani, H., et al. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2402813122

Bentley, T. G. K., et al. (2023). Breathing practices for stress and anxiety reduction. Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10741869/

Cohen, G. L., et al. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap, a social-psychological intervention. Science. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16946074/

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://www.fh-zwickau.de/fileadmin/lehre/hochschuldidaktik/docs/dunloskiimprovingstudentlearning.pdf

Fincham, G. W., et al. (2023). Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health, a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 13, 22890. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-27247-y

Huntley, C. D., et al. (2019). The efficacy of interventions for test-anxious university students, a meta-analysis of RCTs. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 63, 36–50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30826687/

Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., Blackstock, E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 208–212. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2790291/

Jamieson, J. P., Peters, B. J., Greenwood, E. J., & Altose, A. J. (2016). Reappraising stress arousal improves classroom exam performance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 579–587. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1948550616644656

Jordt, H., et al. (2017). Values affirmation reduces achievement gaps in a college biology course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(3), ar41. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5589421/

Kestin, G., Miller, K., et al. (2025). AI tutoring outperforms in-class active learning, an RCT. Scientific Reports, 15, 17458. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-97652-6

Priebe, N. P., & Kurtz-Costes, B. E. (2022). The effect of mindfulness programs on collegiate test anxiety. Mindfulness, 13(11), 2868–2878. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9589788/

Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331(6014), 211–213. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1199427

Rupprecht, C., et al. (2021). Pre-performance routines and performance under pressure, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(6), 1765–1787. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1612197X.2020.1863578

von der Embse, N., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates, a 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–493. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29156362/

Yılmazer, E., Hamamcı, Z., & Türk, F. (2024). Effects of mindfulness on test anxiety, a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1401467. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11238660/

Aranberri-Ruiz, A., Aritzeta, A., Olarza, A., Soroa, G., & Mindeguia, R. (2022). Breath-focused HRV biofeedback reduces anxiety and social stress in primary education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10181. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10181

Rude, S. S., et al. (2023). Chasing elusive expressive writing effects. Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192595/pdf

Wu, Z., et al. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of values affirmation on academic achievement. Journal of Social Issues, 77(3), 792–824. https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/josi.12415